Silhouette of soldier are using drone and laptop computer for scouting during military operation against the backdrop of a sunset. Greeting card for Veterans Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day.
On July 13, 2025, South Asia’s fragile stability was jolted by allegations of Indian drone strikes on militant camps inside Myanmar. The United Liberation Front of Assam–Independent (ULFA-I) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of Manipur claimed their camps were targeted using WARMATE loitering munitions, leaving three senior leaders dead and 19 cadres injured. Physical wreckage of drones, reportedly of Israeli and French origin, was cited as evidence. Though the Indian Army quickly denied any involvement, the allegations—and their implications—cannot be dismissed lightly.
This incident raises urgent questions about India’s willingness to respect international borders, its growing reliance on advanced drone warfare, and the risks such unilateral actions pose to regional peace and trust. If confirmed, the attacks represent a serious breach of Myanmar’s sovereignty. Using drones to conduct extraterritorial strikes marks an escalation from traditional counter-insurgency operations. By carrying the battle across an international border, India risks converting what is essentially a domestic insurgency problem into a regional flashpoint.
Myanmar’s borderlands are already volatile, hosting a patchwork of insurgent groups, displaced civilians, and fragile ceasefires. The destruction of ULFA-I and PLA camps at Waktham Basti, Hoyat Basti, and Hakiyot may have tactical benefits for India, but such operations inevitably destabilize local communities, displace civilians, and invite retaliation by insurgents. The net result is not greater security but a wider cycle of violence across porous borders.
This is not the first time India has been accused of violating Myanmar’s territorial integrity. In 2015, during “Operation Hot Pursuit,” Indian Para Special Forces reportedly crossed 5–10 km into Myanmar to eliminate insurgent hideouts, killing between 30 and 50 militants. That operation, like the recent drone allegations, was officially downplayed by New Delhi but widely reported in local and international media. The precedent matters. A pattern is emerging where India conducts covert extraterritorial operations while maintaining public deniability. Each such action undermines regional trust and casts doubt on India’s stated commitment to multilateralism, diplomacy, and respect for sovereignty.
The alleged use of WARMATE drones, advanced loitering munitions of foreign origin, signals India’s growing appetite for high-tech precision strikes beyond its borders. This raises several concerns:
- Credibility vs. Denial: Wreckage of drones reportedly found at the site undermines India’s official denials. By denying involvement despite physical evidence, India risks losing credibility both regionally and globally.
- Civilian Risks: Drones may reduce risk for the attacker’s forces, but they heighten the chance of collateral damage to local populations in already fragile zones.
- Regional Arms Race: India’s willingness to use drone warfare against insurgents abroad could prompt neighboring states and militant groups to adopt similar technologies, escalating instability across South and Southeast Asia.
Adding to the controversy, just three days after the alleged strikes, a high-level Indian military delegation led by Lt Gen Shrinjay Pratap Singh visited Myanmar on July 16, officially for “border security talks.” This timing raises eyebrows. Critics argue the visit was less about cooperation and more about managing the fallout of covert aggression. Diplomatic engagement, when paired with covert military actions, projects India not as a responsible regional leader but as a state relying on unilateral militarism masked by diplomacy. This duality complicates trust-building efforts with neighbors, especially in a region where historical grievances and border tensions already run deep.
India aspires to be seen as a responsible regional and global power, yet actions like these undermine that narrative. By denying involvement while evidence points otherwise, India risks being seen as disingenuous. By masking military aggression as “border talks,” it conveys duplicity rather than transparency. For a country that positions itself as a champion of international law, democracy, and stability, such contradictions are costly. They not only erode India’s moral standing but also fuel skepticism about its long-term intentions.
If India seeks lasting peace in its northeast and regional stability in South Asia, it must rethink the temptation of unilateral drone warfare. True security lies not in short-term tactical gains, but in long-term political solutions and respect for sovereignty.
The alleged July 2025 drone strikes inside Myanmar are more than a tactical incident; they represent a dangerous precedent in South Asia’s security landscape. They risk destabilizing fragile borderlands, undermining regional trust, and damaging India’s credibility as a responsible power. If true, India’s actions project militarism over diplomacy, secrecy over transparency, and force over cooperation. Such a path can only lead to deeper instability. For the sake of its own credibility and regional peace, India must step back from the edge of unilateral aggression and embrace a strategy grounded in dialogue, diplomacy, and respect for sovereignty.
0 Comments
LEAVE A COMMENT
Your email address will not be published