Nirmala Sitharaman’s economics as an act of god in India

0
1032

Will FM answer how to describe mismanagement of economy before pandemic: Chidambaram on 'Act of God' remark - DTNext.in

God, please answer?” the former finance minister asked. Chidambaram also slammed the

Centre for asking states to borrow more to make up for revenue losses due to pending GST dues.

 

by Bhabani Shankar Nayak   30 August 2020

The Finance Minister of India, Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman in Mr. Narendra Modi led BJP government has attributed the pandemic led economic downturn as an act of god. She is not alone in this ‘act of god’ bandwagon. The theological reasoning gives temporary relief to the ruling classes but failed to provide long term hiding ground in history.  The extraordinary economic fall out of the COVID-19 pandemic gives an opportunity to the ruling classes and neoliberal economists to hide all their failures. The neoliberal authoritarian governments always find a way to manipulate and outsource their ignorance and responsibilities to god. The COVID-19 pandemic and economic crises are neither ‘an act of God’ nor ‘people force on themselves’. The market of wildlife consumption, destruction of nature, neoliberal capitalism, and failure of states and governments are responsible for global pandemic and economic crises.

The ‘act of god’ theory of Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman is putting herself in theological trouble. The Hindu religion has 33 million gods and goddesses and religious Hindus pray more than 33 million registered and unregistered god and goddesses. Some are mythological deities and some are living deities too. It is difficult to fix the blame on one god or goddess. You may not have a real choice in a capitalist supermarket as a consumer. There is no freedom of choice for consumers under neoliberal capitalism unless you have purchasing power and disposable incomes. But there is real freedom of choice in gods and goddesses in the Hindu religion. Even the hierarchical caste and temple barriers have failed to be an obstacle in the choice of your gods and goddesses. There is no mystery here. India is a society of cultural diversity, which breeds religious diversity and vice versa.  The religious and cultural diversity in India is a bane for Hindutva politics represented by Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman. It would be easier for her to evoke ‘Karma theory’ as outlined in the Bhagavad Gita to justify the government and blame all Indians or all the people in the world for the ordeals of global economic and health crises.

The ‘Karma theory’ is the best way to escape from the constitutional responsibilities and economic ignorance of the leadership. The ‘Karma theory’ not only individualises responsibilities and results of one’s own work but also externalises individual problems to the results of the Karma in a previous life. The Karma theory helps to naturalise and normalise the crises, structural inequalities, exploitation, and risk-free accumulation of national and global capitalist classes in India. There is no business like the business of religion. It is risk-free. The profit belongs to the priest and crisis is an individual responsibility.

The Indian economy was knockdown by mistaken economic policies, social insecurities, and directionless politics.  Do not blame the Modi government for the demonetisation, GST, unplanned and authoritarian lockdown, and lack of investment in public health and health infrastructure. All are pre-planned by God and destined to happen beyond the control of state and governments. These arguments are not only obnoxious but also reflects the arrogant economic illiteracy of Hindutva leadership.

The hierarchical and Brahmanical Hindu social order-based ‘caste’ and ‘capitalism’ are the twin pillars of Hindutva politics in India. The Karma theory in the Hindu religion provides theological and ideological justifications for such an exploitative and unequal society like other religions in other parts of the world. The act of god theory of Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman hides her failures as finance minister, hides her government failures, and provides breathing space to capitalist classes in India with all government support.  The Karma theory would help Ms Nirmala Sitharaman immensely and provide cover up to her government failures. It would also discourage Indian citizens to resist the government as asking for one’s own rightful share is a bad Karma.

The legal usage of ‘an act of God’ might help the corporates and insurance companies but it will not help the government to abandon its roles and responsibilities in the long run. In this way, ‘the Karma theory’ is a superior excuse than ‘the act of God’ arguments. The Karma theory is not just about personal Karma in the previous and current life, it is about seeing life as a whole and justifying every action of the power in society. The Karma theory also domesticates production, consumption, and distribution. It organises it with caste hierarchy. Therefore, it would be good for Hindutva forces to fall back on Karma theory to justify loot, corruption, dominance, and deaths in the Indian republic.

The markets, ruling classes, and gods have failed the people in history. And governments are overthrown to the dustbins of history by the reasoning power of people. The collective experience breeds collective movements to steer society out of the crises. It is a matter of time when neither the acts of god nor Modi government can stop the emanating upheavals in India. The 33 million-plus gods and goddesses in India cannot take the blames and witness to the deceptive politics of the BJP government led by Modi. Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman’s act of god explanation has lost its relevance in history. It is illusionary like Hindutva’s promise of salvation of life under Mod’s rule. The powerful mass movement can only save India and Indians from the disasters called Hindutva; a cocktail of arrogance and ignorance.