Illustration source linkedin
As India gears up for its upcoming general elections, the international community must intensify pressure on the government to address concerns surrounding civil liberties and adherence to international standards, particularly in the realm of global finance and counter-terrorism efforts. Recent revelations regarding India’s conduct have raised significant alarm regarding the state of civil liberties within the nation. As the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) conducts its Mutual Evaluation Review (MER) of India, disturbing reports have surfaced, indicating a deliberate exploitation of laws targeting non-profit organizations (NPOs) and a disregard for international standards.
The Global NPO Coalition on FATF has submitted a comprehensive report, revealing India’s alleged misuse of FATF recommendations to suppress non-profit organizations under the guise of combating terrorism. Laws like the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) have been amended purportedly to address corruption but have been used to curtail freedom of expression and association.
Of particular concern is India’s failure to adhere to FATF standards outlined in the 2010 MER, including the neglect to conduct a comprehensive assessment of its financial institutions and a detailed risk assessment of the NPO sector for terrorist financing. Allegations of significant financial irregularities, amounting to approximately $674.9 million in terror financing from 2009 to 2018, raise serious questions about India’s commitment to combating financial crimes while respecting civil liberties.
India’s banking institutions have been accused of withholding funds from beneficiary organizations based on government-flagged security concerns, adversely affecting numerous domestic NGOs. Central agencies like the Enforcement Directorate and the Central Bureau of Investigation have faced accusations of political motivation and misuse to target opposition leaders and civil society.
As the FATF evaluates India’s compliance, it must go beyond technical assessments and consider broader implications for civil liberties. The upcoming plenary discussion in June 2024 presents a critical opportunity for the FATF to address India’s actions and hold the government accountable for its alleged violations of both FATF standards and international human rights law.
Furthermore, as India approaches general elections, the government bears the responsibility to uphold civil liberties and international standards. The recent revocation of FCRA registration for prominent organizations like the Center for Policy Research raises concerns about stifling dissent and curbing activities critical to public discourse. International pressure must intensify to ensure that India implements necessary reforms to align with global standards and respect civil liberties.
In a seminar titled “Unveiling the Future – FATF’s Impact on South Asia 2023,” speakers underscored the concerning nexus between crime and Indian politics, urging strict scrutiny of India’s involvement in state-terrorism and illegal activities. With Pakistan expressing its resolve to resist any India-sponsored terrorist agenda, the international community must hold India accountable and ensure that it upholds democratic principles and respects civil liberties as it approaches the crucial juncture of general elections.
The forthcoming general elections in India present a pivotal moment for the nation and the international community alike. As one of the largest democracies in the world, India’s electoral process must not only be free and fair but must also uphold fundamental rights and liberties. Unfortunately, recent developments have cast doubt on India’s commitment to these principles.
The FATF’s ongoing evaluation of India’s compliance with global anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing standards provides a crucial opportunity to address these concerns. The allegations of misuse of financial regulations to suppress dissenting voices and stifle civil society organizations must be thoroughly investigated and addressed.
At the heart of these concerns is the erosion of civil liberties and democratic norms in India. The targeting of non-profit organizations and civil society groups through draconian laws and regulatory measures not only undermines freedom of expression and association but also threatens the very fabric of democracy. It is incumbent upon the FATF and the broader international community to hold India accountable for these actions and ensure that corrective measures are taken to restore respect for civil liberties and democratic principles.
Moreover, as India navigates the complexities of its electoral process, it must demonstrate a firm commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting fundamental rights. The revocation of FCRA registration for organizations critical of government policies sends a chilling message about the state of democracy in India. It is imperative that the government ensures a level playing field for all political actors and respects the right of citizens to engage in peaceful dissent and advocacy.
In light of these developments, the international community must enhance pressure on India to uphold its obligations under international law and respect civil liberties. The FATF’s role in this regard is particularly crucial, as its evaluation process can serve as a catalyst for meaningful change. By holding India accountable for its actions and promoting greater transparency and accountability, the FATF can contribute to the protection of civil liberties and the promotion of democratic values not only in India but also across the wider region.
In conclusion, the forthcoming general elections in India present a critical test for the nation’s commitment to democracy and civil liberties. The FATF and the international community must seize this opportunity to address concerns surrounding India’s conduct and ensure that corrective measures are taken to uphold fundamental rights and democratic principles. Only through concerted action can we safeguard the integrity of the electoral process and protect the rights and freedoms of all citizens.