Is the reputable, and supposedly independent, Overseas Development Institute helping the Bangladesh government to enforce here in London the draconian restrictions that journalists experience in Bangladesh?
And is it, in light of how ODI dealt with a question from a Channel Four News journalist at the meeting itself, protecting the prime minister from having to respond to tough questions?
It certainly appears so.
ODI Vetting?
When I applied a week ago to attend the ODI event at which Sheikh Hasina, the Bangladesh Prime Minister, was due to speak. I got a very welcoming response. from Ben Tritton, the event organiser. “We’d be delighted to welcome you to ODI” he said.
So I was rather astonished to receive an e-mail on Monday morning, the day before the talk, disinviting me from the event.
“Apologies but over the weekend we have received a large number of high level responses and this event is highly over-subscribed. We will therefore be unfortunately not able to welcome you to the event”
This seemed rather odd and I therefore immediately responded with this e-mail
“Could you please clarify whether you have allowed the Bangladesh delegation/government/representatives to vet the list of those who can attend the talk.”
I received no response.
On Tuesday, the morning of the talk, I called Mr Tritton and asked him why I had been disinvited. He kept me holding for about a minute and then repeated what he has written in his e-mail. I asked him how many people, like me, had been disinvited and he said 15 people
I then asked him the same question I had earlier e-mailed – about whether he allowed the Bangladesh government or representatives to vet the list of those who could attend the talk. If the ODI had not allowed vetting, one would have expected the answer to be a direct “No.” Indeed one would have expected an independent think-tank to immediately respond in this way. However, he said:
“I am afraid I cant comment at all on that”
This is as close to a confirmation as you will ever get without the ODI saying “yes”. If they hadn’t allowed the Bangladesh government an ability to vet the invite list, the ODI would surely have just denied it.
The ODI must know about all this so why would it participate in apparently allowing the Bangladesh government to dictate who could and could not come to the meeting?
Channel Four News*
In addition, of course, and more significantly, the ODI did everything to prevent Channel Four News to ask a difficult question to Sheikh Hasina about human rights issues in Bangladesh.
