Tasmiah Ahmed in Dhaka | Darko Janjevic
Months after ousting Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh is looking forward to fresh elections, which will produce a new government that could take over from the interim administration led by Muhammed Yunus.
The interim leader and Nobel Prize winner has pledged to conduct “vital reforms” and then hold a free, fair, and inclusive vote in the South Asian country.
But despite pledges of inclusivity, many Bangladeshis are deeply angry with Hasina’s Awami League (AL) and oppose the prospect of it simply rejoining the country’s politics as any other major party.
Hasina’s opponents blame the ousted leader for the deadly violence that claimed hundreds of lives earlier this year.
At least some members of the interim Cabinet seem to share this sentiment. The Yunus-led government is still engaged in dialogue with major parties to ensure a fair election, but it said it would exclude groups it labels “fascist” or allied with such factions.
Interim leaders pressured from all sides
The Yunus’ government rests on a wide but fragile alliance of various political parties, minority groups and student protesters who bore the brunt of the political violence. With the election date yet to be determined, they can ill afford to alienate any part of their base, especially the masses that pushed out the Hasina government.
At the same time, however, BNP General Secretary Mirza Fakhrul criticized the signals coming from the interim government about banning Hasina’s party.
“Why exclude the Awami League from the elections if we genuinely aim for democracy?” he asked.
Does Yunus speak for the people?
Political scientist Sabbir Ahmed told DW that the interim government was interpreting terms like “level playing field for fair elections” in ways that serve its own interests.
“This government, having taken power without a popular mandate, does not represent the will of the people,” he told DW, pointing out that the July-August uprising was largely urban-focused.
“Regardless of what the interim government claims, it cannot establish a democratic environment for fair electoral competition if it excludes the Awami League,” he added.
Unsurprisingly, Hasina’s allies also oppose the statements hinting at their ban. Former Foreign Minister Hasan Mahmud told DW that AL was eager to cooperate with other political parties to ensure a peaceful transition to democracy, adding that Bangladesh must eliminate politics of hatred, denial, and revenge .
He also accused the interim government of delaying the election without adequate justification, seemingly aiming to retaliate against the AL.
“Excluding the Awami League — which is backed by almost half of the population — from the election would not attract an inclusive process,” he added. “Such an election would likely face rejection from both the public and the international community.”
Germany wants an investigation, then reconciliation
Meanwhile, signals from outside Bangladesh also seem to indicate a desire for internal rapprochement. Last week, German Ambassador Achim Tröster told The Daily Star, a Bangladeshi English-language newspaper, that reconciliation would be necessary for a peaceful future.
“What it needs is to change one’s mind and to cast away the shadows of a bloody and revengeful past,” he said.
At the same time, he acknowledged that the reconciliation would not be possible without investigating and acknowledging the truth regarding the deadly unrest.
The head of the center-right BJP, Andaleeve Rahman, also told DW that AL owes an apology to the public.
“Hasina’s party is facing a leadership crisis and can only move forward in politics if they acknowledge their responsibility and express remorse for the deaths that occurred during the July-August revolution,” he said.
Commenting on the recent arson of the political office of the Jatiya Party, he described it as unacceptable but said Hasina’s allies deserved the public backlash they are currently facing, as they, too, have betrayed the people.
source : dw