Gabbard’s apparent justification of 2002 Gujarat pogrom sparks social media furor

  • By a Staff Writer   India Abroad  Oct 6, 2019
Gabbard’s apparent justification of 2002 Gujarat pogrom sparks social media furor

Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard’s apparent justification of the 2002 massacre of Muslims in Gujarat during an Oct. 1 town hall in Londonderry, N.H. has sparked a social media furor decrying the Hawaii Democratic lawmaker and presidential candidate.

At the town hall when an audience member told Gabbard during a question answer that Prime Minister Modi was the Chief Minister of Gujarat and that many consider him to be complicit in the deadly ’02 Gujarat riots, Gabbard shot back, “Do you know what instigated those riots?”

Reacting to Gabbard’s question Arvin Valmuci, a spokesperson for Organization for Minorities of India, said Congresswoman Gabbard’s justification of the 2002 Gujarat Pogrom is the “most abominable form” of victim-blaming.

“With cold and emotionless calculation, she excuses the worst state-sponsored atrocity in modern Indian history by suggesting the thousands who died somehow deserved it.

“Gabbard’s response trumps the sociopathic attitude of Modi, who says the only sorrow he feels for victims is same as if a puppy were run over by a car,” Valmuci said.

In 2013, when asked if he regretted the incidents of 2002, Modi responded, “(If) someone else is driving a car and we’re sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will it be painful or not? Of course, it is…. If something bad happens anywhere, it is natural to be sad.”

In April 2002, Human Rights Watch said, “What happened in Gujarat was not a spontaneous uprising, it was a carefully orchestrated attack against Muslims. The attacks were planned in advance and organized with extensive participation of the police and state government officials.”

OFMI said the groups most directly held responsible for violence against Muslims in Gujarat include the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, the Bajrang Dal, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, and the umbrella organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. Gabbard’s perceived justification of the pogrom sparked a harsh response across social media.

Dr. Ashok Swain, a professor of peace and conflict research in Uppsala University in Uppsala, Sweden, commented, “Tulsi Gabbard, in order to defend Modi, shamelessly justifies killing of 2,000 Muslims in Gujarat riot under Modi’s watch!”

Saif Khalid, a journalist with Al Jazeera English said, “Tulsi Gabbard whitewashes Modi’s complicity in independent India’s worst anti-Muslim violence.”

Pieter Friedrich, an analyst of South Asian affairs, who has written about Gabbard’s alleged connections to Hindu nationalist groups, asked, “Can you imagine someone saying that about Kristallnacht, the first Nazi pogrom against the Jews,” alluding to the 1938 assassination of a German diplomat by a Jewish teenager, which was used as a pretext for Kristallnacht.

“Tulsi Gabbard is blaming Muslims for instigating the 2002 Gujarat riots,” commented Dr. Alf Gunvald Nilsen, Professor of Sociology at University of Pretoria and author of Dispossession and Resistance in India.