Call for Naval Nuclear CBM’s between South Asian Nuclear Rivals

Pakistan Defence

By: Ahyousha Khan      27 August 2018

In complex and dynamic South Asian security structure, new security concerns are evolving without the previous ones being resolved, leading to further deterioration of regional security. Security dynamics of the region are dominated by the power play between nuclear arch-rivals of the region – India and Pakistan. Even before their nuclearization, both states went for an all-out war with each other, and their animosity and mistrust eventually led to the nuclearization of the region. Since their overt nuclearization in 1998, both states have not ventured into an all-out war, but that does not mean that all is well between both nuclear rivals.

According to the recent trend of arms buildup and weaponization in the region, one can easily predict that although fear of mutual vulnerability has stopped both sides to attack each other, it is failing in halting the arms race in the region. However, an appalling aspect in this arms race is that it has no bounds and it is spreading into ocean, space, and cyberspace as well, which is destroying natural and virtual habitat. Recently, both states are all the rage about naval nuclearization to achieve credible second strike capability or to acquire deterrence at all levels of conflict. After witnessing India’s rapid naval build-up which includes aircraft carrier, conventional submarines, naval fleets, ballistic and cruise missiles like (K4-K15, Sagarika, Brahmos, and Dhanush), indigenously built fleets of SSBNs and SSNs, Pakistan also went ahead with achieving the second strike capability in order to extend deterrence at all levels of conflicts.

Making its borders secure is the inalienable right of every state and so is the protection of its interests. But, every state also should reduce the chances of accidental conflicts, crisis or war, if there are any, for the peace, stability, and welfare of the people. One thing that the Cold War should have taught the belligerent South Asia neighbors is that there is no end to an arms race; once deterrence is acquired, it should not be tested with new doctrinal thoughts or new technological innovations. States’ policies, doctrines, and technological innovations compel them to pie-up fancy weaponry by resorting to continuous arms build-up. This surely has repercussions. Similarly, weaponization in the sea while difficult is quite dangerous. It is managed through different mechanisms and requires a lot of time. Talking mainly about the Indian Ocean, it probably shouldn’t have been nuclearized and militarized in the first place. The seas remain to be the primary source proving the line of communication. However, since the Indian Ocean is now already nuclearized, the need is for both India and Pakistan to work out the measures which would help avoid accidental conflicts as both parties are new to this arena and are eagerly flexing their muscles.

Thus, to avoid a nuclear clash and accidental nuclear conflicts it is necessary that both states revive the dialogue process as aggressive attitudes will not help either side in achieving their interests. Level of alertness, command, control systems and vessels with dual capabilities has further complicated the sea-based operations and add an element of ambiguity to it. Both India and Pakistan are newbies in naval nuclear technology. Thus, chances of accidents are highly likely. So, it is pertinent that both states develop and keep the communication channels open through which any probable naval nuclear accident should be communicated to the other side. Establishment of Hotline between naval officers of both states could be one of the significant means of communication to avoid any confusion and ambiguity in the event of accident or crisis.

Both India and Pakistan are developing new missile technologies, especially cruise missiles and are tipping them with nuclear weapons to be used in naval ships and naval submarines. Both states already have CBMs about pre-notification of ballistic missile tests, but it does not entail the cruise missiles. So considering latest developments, it is necessary that both states sign certain CBMs regarding missile tests.

Although general perception is that CBMs in South Asia have not achieved much in a complex nuclear environment where animosity is at peak faith in these small initiatives to reflect goodwill can perform miracles and resultantly can reduce the distrust, hatred, tension, and conflict.

Posts Carousel

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

SAJ on Facebook

SAJ Socials

   

Top Authors